Source: www.howardforums.com --- Saturday, August 03, 2013
Can anyone suggest how to acquire a Nokia Lumia 1020 for use in Canada? Any help is appreciated. Thank you ...
Source: http://www.howardforums.com/showthread.php/1806546-Acquire-Lumia-1020-for-use-in-Canada?goto=newpost
London 2012 field hockey Missy Franklin Hunter Pence NBCOlympics Danell Leyva Ye Shiwen OJ Murdock
Sorry, Readability was unable to parse this page for content.
Source: http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/pages/view.asp?page=40356
good friday Dufnering What Is Good Friday Monsanto Protection Act Jenna Wolfe Jarome Iginla Jessica Brown Findlay
by Ken Schott
A Daily Gazette sports blog
Ken Schott blogs about college hockey & more
The 2013-14 NBA schedule will be announced Tuesday on NBA TV starting at 6 p.m.
Matt Winer will host the one-hour special and be joined by analysts Steve Smith and Isiah Thomas.
Follow @slapschotts on Twitter. Follow @dgazettesports on Twitter.
Source: http://www.dailygazette.com/weblogs/schott/2013/aug/01/nba-tv-to-televise-nba-schedule-announcement/
Ilya Kovalchuk 7-11 Aisha Tyler Marshall Henderson derek jeter Yasiel Puig The Bridge Fx
In 2012, Ford recalled about 423,000 Ford Escape and Mazda Tribute models made during the period of 2001-04 because the gas pedal could remain depressed even after the drivers removed their foot from the pedal, which could cause crashes.
However, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration said Ford's recall "may have been untimely", Xinhua reported Thursday.
The NHTSA said Ford knew about the problem in May 2011, but failed to take action until the safety regulator began its investigation in July 2012.
vanderbilt evan mathis staff sgt. robert bales jason russell norfolk state st patrick s day parade duke
Source: http://feeds.sciencedaily.com/~r/sciencedaily/health_medicine/genes/~3/_Hihnld1TEk/130801233106.htm
florida panthers tannehill joel ward mock draft north country brian mcknight sbux
Source: www.howardforums.com --- Thursday, August 01, 2013Cellphone Repair Parts &Tools https://www.gounlock.com 24/7 online web-shop. Ship orders same day from USA. Attached Images ? ...
giuliana rancic temptations work hard play hard tim ferriss wmt human nature arkansas football
Sorry, Readability was unable to parse this page for content.
obama on jimmy fallon pilar sanders andrew young real life barbie zipper armenian genocide asteroid mining
Good news for fans of the scientific method: the largest and most influential university system on the planet will be giving out its research for free. After 6-year-long fight with the for-profit academic publishing industry, the University of California Senate approved open access standards for research on all 10 campuses. The policy is major win for those who want to see academic research made public, rather than behind the pricy paywalls of big publishers. Last year, Harvard Library penned a memo urging the university’s 2,100 faculty to boycott for-profit academic research databases and instead submit articles to lower-cost open access journals. Universities pay millions for access to their colleague’s research, with subscriptions costs up to $40,000 for a single journal. Publishing, too, can cost many times more for more prestigious closed-access journals. Nature reports that it can cost $5,000 to publish in the biology journal, Cell Reports, but only $1,350 for the most popular open-access journal PLoS ONE. ?It’s still ludicrous how much it costs to publish research,” said molecular biologist at the University of California, Berkeley, Michael Eisen. The open access movement has friends in high-places. Recently, in response to a WeThePeople petition, the White House pledged a whopping $100 million to promote open access and to require all federally-funded research to be free of charge. There are issues with open access; it costs money to curate high-quality peer-review and market the research. Many academic papers take years to write, and its a risky proposition to leave it in the hands of an experimental publisher. But, speaking as a writer who likes to include academic research in my articles, open access could not come soon enough. Media outlets get inundated with research findings, but often can’t get access to the articles to report on them critically. Open access may not be perfect, but it is the future. The more people use it, the better the journals will become. And, ultimately, there will be little need for closed access at all.Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Techcrunch/~3/WLXZOwY3Xg0/
Dave Grohl 121212 Cal State Fullerton Ravi Shankar Geminid meteor shower right to work Clackamas Town Center
July 31, 2013 |??
Share ?
Email ?
Print
Image of the Week #102, July 31st, 2013:
From: How the Fleas? Next of Kin Ended up Living on a Liverwort in Alaska by Jennifer Frazer at The Artful Amoeba.
Source: The Flea, by Robert Hooke. From Micrographia, 1665. Public domain.
At first glance, Robert Hooke?s illustration of a flea is basic, clean, and straightforward. Under today?s standards of 3D computer graphics, we might not even look twice at it. But note the year: 1665! The flea first appeared as an 18-inch engraving in Hooke?s classic Micrographia. At the time, no one save a few pioneers of early microscopy had ever seen a small invertebrate magnified. Hooke?s flea would have been most people?s only acquaintance with the finer details of this common parasite. Seeing this speck of an animal with every hair, every sclerite in enlarged detail must have been a revelation. For more about this image, see here.
About the Author: Bora Zivkovic is the Blog Editor at Scientific American, chronobiologist, biology teacher, organizer of ScienceOnline conferences and editor of Open Laboratory anthologies of best science writing on the Web. Follow on Twitter @boraz. More??
The views expressed are those of the author and are not necessarily those of Scientific American.
Rights & Permissions
Source: http://rss.sciam.com/~r/sciam/basic-science/~3/0w0-0NImhNI/post.cfm
andy roddick Costa Rica Earthquake sandra fluke costa rica Earthquake Costa Rica Clinton speech Michael Strahan
Sorry, Readability was unable to parse this page for content.
Source: http://www.facebook.com/WrestlingNewsSource/posts/512856245449533
ravi leigh espn greg oden st patricks day st. bonaventure ira glass
I think he?s going to end up not running, but if his favorables stay this high, maybe he has no choice.
He?s technically ?next in line? and he?d make a decent compromise candidate (as would fellow Wisconsinite Scott Walker) for righties who are leery of Christie, Paul, and Rubio for various reasons. Second look at Paul Ryan?
Are Ryan?s numbers really that surprising? He?s been overlooked on blogs lately because we?ve all been busy shaking our fists at Rubio over immigration and gawking at the Rand Paul/Chris Christie brawl, but thanks to 2012, Ryan?s name recognition is sky high. He?s a warrior on the budget but soft-spoken enough not to spook moderates. Grassroots righties are newly steamed at him because he seems to be slipping into the Rubio role in the House of pushing conservatives towards a deal on amnesty, but nothing?s happened yet and he?s smart enough to keep a much lower profile on the issue than Rubio did. Most low-information voters on our side probably know him as that nice young guy from the midwest who?s deeply concerned that our spending is unsustainable. Why wouldn?t he be at 65 percent favorables? And why wouldn?t he have better numbers with tea partiers than with centrists? His core issue is reforming the welfare state. Centrists resist that, partly because they?re more comfortable with bigger government and partly because they?re probably more sensitive on balance to ?electability? concerns. Conservatives might be willing to risk a ferocious political backlash in the name of fixing entitlements. I doubt many centrists are.
The real surprise is Rand Paul?s numbers. His favorables among tea partiers are now 11 points better than Rubio?s, thanks in part to immigration, of course. But his numbers among non-tea-partiers are comparable to centrist hero Chris Christie?s and amnesty champion Marco Rubio?s. Maybe that?ll change in the primaries as his philosophy is scrutinized more closely; if centrists think Paul Ryan is too much of a threat to the welfare state, wait ?til they get a load of the great libertarian hope. Christie?s unfavorables among non-TPers are also a mild surprise. I wonder if that?s more a reaction to his policies or to fatigue with his tough-guy shtick. Either way, maybe he?s more vulnerable than we thought.
One more graph:
For all the babbling about party divisions lately vis-a-vis defunding ObamaCare, there?s only minor division on immigration. Pluralities on both the right and in the center think the GOP should be more conservative about the border. Tell me something, though: What would it mean for the party to be ?more conservative? on gay marriage at this point? Despite a heavy tide nationally and in government in favor of legalizing SSM, only a handful of congressional Republicans have come out in support of it. House Republicans sued to enforce DOMA because Obama?s DOJ refused to. Rubio declared that benefits for gay spouses under the Gang of Eight bill would have been a dealbreaker for him. What should the party be doing to please social conservatives that it isn?t? Forget about the Federal Marriage Amendment. That?s nothing but a rhetorical device at this point; it?ll never pass.
I?m loath to close with something from Think Progress but if their transcript of this Paul Ryan townhall vid is accurate, it?s news. Here he is on immigration reform:
RYAN: [...] Bringing these bills to the floor, we?ll find out. It is not, ?they don?t come to the floor unless we have a majority of the majority,? because we don?t know if we have a majority until we vote on it. So here?s where I see things going. I?ve spoken to John Boehner as recently as three days ago about this, which is, we all agree it is better to legislate in stages instead of one big thousand plus page bill that no one has read. [...] I?m trying to get to a consensus so a majority of us do support those component parts. I believe that?s achievable because when people really look at the details and they focus on what?s right, I believe what I?ve just laid out is something that a consensus of Republicans and Democrats can agree to.
Is that quote accurate? The audio makes it hard to tell. The whole point of the Hastert Rule is not to bring bills to the floor until the Speaker knows that a majority of his caucus supports them. Doing it the way Ryan describes (or seems to describe) would mean abandoning the Hastert Rule; you bring the bill to the floor, kinda sorta hoping/expecting that a majority of GOPers will vote for it, and if it turns out that only a few dozen do ? plus 200 Democrats, such that the bill passes ? then whoopsie! Guess they miscalculated. Is that what he?s saying or did TP misunderstand?
16 and pregnant ludwig mies van der rohe jamie lynn sigler mega millions jackpot black panther party frank martin pink slime
